Sensor Accuracy Analysis on Incubator Analyzer to Measure Noise and Airflow Parameters

  • Arrum Sekarwati Department of Medical Electronics Technology, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya
  • Syaifudin Syaifudin Department of Medical Electronics Technology, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya
  • Torib Hamzah Department of Medical Electronics Technology, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya
  • Shubhrojit Misra Jadavpur University
Keywords: Incubator Analyzer, Noise, Air Flow, TFT Display


Infant incubators are equipment to maintain a stable body temperature for premature babies. Premature babies need room conditioning that is close to conditions in the womb. Room conditioning is carried out in a baby incubator by providing a stable temperature, relative humidity, and measured air flow. This parameter must be controlled so as not to exceed the threshold that will harm the baby. Periodic calibration should be applied to the infant incubator to monitor its function. To ensure the availability of baby incubators according to service standards, it is necessary to conduct test (calibrate) using an incubator analyzer. The purpose of this study is to conduct further research on the incubator analyzer that focuses on discussing the accuracy of noise and airflow sensors with the gold standard. In this study, an experiment was carried out for the sensitivity level of several sensors that had been treated by giving treatment to sensors to choose sensors with good sensitivity to be assembled into one in the incubator analyzer module. The noise sensors (KY-037 and Analog Sound Sensor V2.2) were further compared with the values ​​on the sound level meter and the airflow sensor (D6F-V03A1) was compared with the anemometer. Sensors whose values ​​are close to the comparison values ​​were selected to be integrated into the incubator analyzer module. The incubator analyzer module used Arduino Mega2560 as a data processor and was equipped with an SD Card for the data storage. The built incubator analyzer module was also compared to the Fluke INCU II gold standard for data analysis. The results showed that the Analog Sound Sensor V2.2 had the highest error value (-4.6%) at 32°C and the D6F-V03A1 had the ability to measure sensitivity, where the results were more accurate than INCU II. Based on the error value of the noise sensor, the V2.2 sensor can be applied to measure noise in the baby incubator and the D6F-V03A1 airflow sensor produced an accuracy of up to 3 digits behind the comma which is more accurate than the standard module. The results of the INCU analyzer from this study can be used to calibrate the baby incubator, so that the certainty of the feasibility of the baby incubator is guaranteed. This research can be used as a reference for other researchers who will develop research on incubator analyzers in the future.


Download data is not yet available.


[1] L. Kristoffersen et al., “Early skin-to-skin contact or incubator for very preterm infants: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial,” Trials, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2016, doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1730-5.
[2] F. Althabe et al., Born Too Soon The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth. 2012. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295659.
[3] H. Mittal, L. Mathew, and A. Gupta, “Design and Development of an Infant Incubator for Controlling Multiple Parameters,” Int. J. Emerg. Trends Electr. Electron., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 2320–9569, 2015.
[4] R. Bahl, A. M. Gülmezoglu, A. Manu, M. Mathai, O. O. Were, and S. von Xylander, “WHO recommendations on interventions to improve preterm birth outcomes,” in World Health Organization, 2015, pp. 1–98.
[5] P. JMR, “Comparative Trial between Neonatal Intensive Care Incubator, Neonatal Laminar Flow Unit and Radiant Warmer,” Res. Pediatr. Neonatol., vol. 1, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.31031/rpn.2017.01.000504.
[6] J. M. R. Perez, S. G. Golombek, C. Fajardo, and A. Sola, “A laminar flow unit for the care of critically ill newborn infants,” Med. Devices Evid. Res., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 163–167, 2013, doi: 10.2147/MDER.S51270.
[7] V. Plangsangmas, S. Leeudomwong, and P. Kongthaworn, “Sound Pressure Level in an Infant Incubator,” Mapan - J. Metrol. Soc. India, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 199–203, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s12647-012-0030-0.
[8] S. M. S. Cardoso, L. de C. Kozlowski, A. B. M. de Lacerda, J. M. Marques, and A. Ribas, “Newborn physiological responses to noise in the neonatal unit,” Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol., vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 583–588, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.11.008.
[9] F. Fernández Zacarías, J. L. Beira Jiménez, P. J. Bustillo Velázquez-Gaztelu, R. Hernández Molina, and S. Lubián López, “Noise level in neonatal incubators: A comparative study of three models,” Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol., vol. 107, pp. 150–154, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.02.013.
[10] J. Neille, K. George, and K. Khoza-Shangase, “A study investigating sound sources and noise levels in neonatal intensive care units,” SAJCH South African J. Child Heal., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 6–10, 2014, doi: 10.7196/SAJCH.676.
[11] J. C. Fortes-Garrido, A. M. Velez-Pereira, M. Gázquez, M. Hidalgo-Hidalgo, and J. P. Bolívar, “The characterization of noise levels in a neonatal intensive care unit and the implications for noise management,” J. Environ. Heal. Sci. Eng., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2014, doi: 10.1186/2052-336X-12-104.
[12] A. Shimizu and H. Matsuo, “Sound Environments Surrounding Preterm Infants Within an Occupied Closed Incubator,” J. Pediatr. Nurs., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. e149–e154, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2015.10.011.
[13] IEC 60601-2-19, Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-19: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of infant incubators. 2014.
[14] J. M. de Araújo, J. M. P. de Menezes, A. A. M. de Albuquerque, O. da M. Almeida, and F. M. U. de Araújo, “Assessment and Certification of Neonatal Incubator Sensors through an Inferential Neural Network,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 15613–15632, 2013, doi: 10.3390/s131115613.
[15] A. Tavakoli Golpaygani, “Why should we have a periodic safety and performance program for medical devices,” J. Biomed. Phys. Eng., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 251–256, 2019, doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.761.
[16] E. Ozdemİrcİ, M. Özarslan Yatak, F. Duran, and M. R. Canal, “Reliability assessments of infant incubator and the analyzer,” Gazi Univ. J. Sci., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1169–1175, 2014.
[17] G. T. Sen and M. Yuksekkaya, “Desing and Test of an Incubator Analyzer,” ISMSIT 2018 - 2nd Int. Symp. Multidiscip. Stud. Innov. Technol. Proc., pp. 2–6, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ISMSIT.2018.8567049.
[18] G. G. Subha and M.Fazilath, “INCUBATOR ANALAYZER WITH AUTOMATIC SHUTTER OPENER,” Int. J. Adv. Inf. Eng. Technol., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 15–18, 2018.
[19] A. Rajalakshmi, K. A. Sunitha, and R. Venkataraman, “A survey on neonatal incubator monitoring system,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1362, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1362/1/012128.
[20] Laily Nurrohmah, Dwi Herry Andayani, and Andjar Pudji, “Development of Incubator Analyzer Using Personal Computer Equiped With Measurement Certificate,” J. Electron. Electromed. Eng. Med. Informatics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 74–79, 2020, doi: 10.35882/jeeemi.v2i2.6.
[21] I. K. N. Paramartha, T. Hamzah, B. Utomo, S. Luthfiyah, and E. ÖZDEMĐRCĐ, “Lost Data and Transmition Speed Analysis on Incubator Analyzer Based IoT Technology,” Int. J. Adv. Heal. Sci. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2022, doi: 10.35882/ijahst.v2i1.7.
[22] V. N. Azkiyak, S. Syaifudin, and D. Titisari, “Incubator Analyzer Using Bluetooth Android Display (Humidity & Air Flow),” Indones. J. Electron. Electromed. Eng. Med. informatics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 71–77, 2020, doi: 10.35882/ijeeemi.v1i2.5.
[23] V. A. Athavale, A. Pati, A. K. M. B. Hossain, and S. Luthfiyah, “INCU Analyzer for Infant Incubator Based on Android Application Using Bluetooth Communication to Improve Calibration Monitoring,” J. Teknokes, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2022, doi: 10.35882/teknokes.v15i1.1.
[24] P. Yin, M. Cao, and Y. Lin, “Research on flow sensor and the pressure sensor with digital asthma diagnosis technology,” Adv. Mater. Res., vol. 1014, pp. 110–114, 2014, doi: 10.4028/
[25] P. J. Webster, Sleep Apnea Therapy Device. Biomedical Engineering, 2017.
[26] R. A. Koestoer, I. Roihan, and A. D. Andrianto, “Product design, prototyping, and testing of twin incubator based on the concept of grashof incubator,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2062, no. January, 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5086560.
[27] A. Alimuddin, A. Ria, S. Irma, A. Rocky, P. Hasudungan, and T. Taufik, “Development and Performance Study of Temperature and Hybrid Controller,” Mdpi, vol. 14, no. 20, p. 6505, 2021.
How to Cite
A. Sekarwati, S. Syaifudin, T. Hamzah, and S. Misra, “Sensor Accuracy Analysis on Incubator Analyzer to Measure Noise and Airflow Parameters”,, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 135-143, Jul. 2022.
Research Paper